nikon makes a serious point and shoot machine for the pro \advanced  amateur

ive been a nikon man for 25 years on his 5 slr when i contracted micro four third fever last june, i still have my d 80 and some great lenses like the 85 1.8 ,105 micro, 501.4........

but nikon has never produced a decent point and shoot to their great shame
before my samsung tl500\ex1 i was a ricoh gx 200 carrryman.... sometimes the cx1 

"2. A faster memory card will improve the performance of your camera."

(Not unlike the misleading pitch by gas companies to make you believe that their premium gas gives the best performance.)

3. Nikon is better than Canon.

3. Nikon is better than Canon.

4. Canon is better than Nikon 

an expensive pro SLR  body  and expensive  exotic glass  will make you a better photographer

37: Digital saves you time compared to film.

(No it doesn’t - if you shoot film you’re careful in what you shoot, so out of a roll of 12 shots on 120, you’ve probably got 6-9 good ones, already chosen. On digital, the typical overspecified dSLR shooter probably shot 500 shots within the same space of time, mostly identical, and will then spend the next few days or evenings sorting them out, picking a few to post-process, giving up, archiving the whole lot to DVD, failing to tag any of them, and five years later when one of those shots might need to be referred to, there’s no hope of ever finding them again among all the other almost similarly named DSC-1234 files. Digital encourages deferred editing, and the workload often proves too high.)

Digital is better than film.

Or the converse: "Digital is not as good as film."

(please dont shoot me.. )
42: P&Ss can't take quality photos...

43: P&Ss can take quality photos...

395: More megapixels is better.